campylobacter ([info]campylobacter) wrote,
@ 2007-03-05 09:55:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:giggly
Entry tags:news tech wiki

Damn the meritocracy! Full speed ahead!
So you want to counter what you perceive as liberal-biased Wikipedia with a conservative-biased Conservapedia, fine. Whatever! Go for it!

But to call Conservapedia UNbiased? ARE YOU OXYMORONICALLY RETARDED?

Wikipedia foes set up 'right site'
http://www.theage.com.au/news/web/wikipedia-foes-set-up-right-site/2007/03/02/1172868789933.html


(Post a new comment)


[info]deslea
2007-03-06 05:42 am UTC (link)
*snerk*

I actually kinda like Conservapedia. (I know, my renegade middle-of-the-road leanings are showing). But you're right - it's not unbiased in the least.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

[info]campylobacter
2007-03-06 06:58 am UTC (link)
Conservapedia is adorable and surprisingly tolerant. Subtly vandalized entries (such as Kangaroo) are allowed to stand.

Waitaminit. You're Australian. Did you post that?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

[info]deslea
2007-03-06 07:05 am UTC (link)
Fraid not. That article shows much too much knowledge of roo mating habits. I'm Australian, and even semi-rural Australian these days - but I'm not that Australian!!!!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

[info]campylobacter
2007-03-06 07:27 am UTC (link)
Darn.

I'm in love with the person who had the final edit on the entry "Greek", and was hoping it was you.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

[info]deslea
2007-03-06 10:50 am UTC (link)
OMG. *sporfle* That's fabulous.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…